|
Rawn (RawArt)
|
x-ray - 02 by doubleM http://www.filterforge.com/filters/3435.html |
|||||
| Posted: July 9, 2007 9:40 am | ||||||
|
Rawn (RawArt)
|
Its a real nice plastic wrap effect, but I have to wonder why you call all your filters "x-ray" when they dont look like x-rays?
Rawn |
|||||
| Posted: July 9, 2007 9:40 am | ||||||
| Kraellin |
ummm, isnt this pretty much the same as that other one you submitted? i mean, i can see some difference, but seems very similar. but then, steviej does this all the time (*ducks some flying glass) so, i guess it's ok Ya can't sell art to artists!
Craig |
|||||
| Posted: July 9, 2007 1:26 pm | ||||||
|
ahimsa
|
You are so bad! |
|||||
| Posted: July 9, 2007 4:14 pm | ||||||
| doubleM | @ Kraellin: the big difference between the filter "x-ray-02" and "transparent foil" is the picture is BREHIND the foil in filter "x-ray-02". and in "transparent foil" is the pic like a print ON the foil. | |||||
| Posted: July 10, 2007 12:08 am | ||||||
|
StevieJ
|
I think it's a viable variation if it can't easily be incorporated into one filter and would make it much easier for the user to find exactly what they are looking for. I've broken quite a few of mine into variants because I don't want to combine unlabeled colorization schemes on switch.....and make users waste alot of time trying to decifer the settings. For example with my glass, if a user wants the plain effect, it's easy to pick out the one that will do it.....if they want something like solar or artistic colorizations, it's real easy to pick out the variant filter that will do the job.....instead of having to dig through a control laiden, unlabeled filter to find it......
Yes he is Steve
“Buzzards gotta eat.....same as worms....." - Clint :) |
|||||
| Posted: July 10, 2007 12:39 pm | ||||||
| Kraellin |
doublem, ok, got it steve, yes, it is viable and so are yours Ya can't sell art to artists!
Craig |
|||||
| Posted: July 10, 2007 2:14 pm | ||||||