ronviers
![]() |
Hi,
I have just finished my first filter (attached). I wonder of some of the experts would be willing to look it over to see it is good enough to submit and that it does what I think it does. Here is what I think it does – I call it ‘Lab Enhance’: This filter uses the Lab color space so the contrast and color can be manipulated separately to avoid unwanted color shifts. First the L channel is extracted and blended with the external image using the multiply blend mode for purposes of contrast enhancement by stretching the midtones and compressing the highlights and shadows – the opacity of this blend is broke out for user manipulation. Second the image is blended back with itself using the overlay blend mode for purposes of detail enhancement – the opacity of this blend is also accessible to the user. Third the a and b color channels are extracted for purposes of saturation manipulation – this takes the form of a saturation slider for the user. Fourth all the channels are reassembled into result. This filter will work either with an image or a selection so it can be used just to enhance a sky or the leaves of a tree or even the entire image. Any comments on how to correct improve or modify this filter to make it more useful or useable would be very much appreciated. Thanks for taking the time to look it over. Also if anyone know how the saturation slider can be reversed so it increases left to right rather than right to left that would be helpful also. Thanks, Ron Lab Enhance.ffxml @ronviers |
|
Posted: April 18, 2007 6:41 pm | ||
ssamm |
When I switch to the selection part, all I get is a black and white image(/mask?). I'm not too familiar with this component, but if this isn't some error on my part or my computer, it could be that you may need to use the selection component as an opacity mask with a blend of the effected image and the original image... (??? Sorry, I may be totally wrong here -- just trying to make sense of what I'm seeing...)
I like the saturation effect. One idea here could be to, in the tiny remapping white box, switch the values you have for minimum and maximum (so the minimum has the higher value and the maximum the lower value). As it is, it seems the higher "Saturation" values gives me some sort of lower saturation (while inverting the numbers would reverse this.) Just my preference here. I did notice that if the Multiply slider is at 0, then there is no overlay effect with the Overlay slider. At first this felt odd, but after looking in the Editor, it makes sense. (So I have no alternatives -- just noting a quirk with blend chains...) BTW, I'm definitely no expert. But I do like "Photo" filters and you did open my eyes to new techniques. Very nice. I look forward to any others you might come up with too. ![]() |
|
Posted: April 19, 2007 12:07 am | ||
ssamm |
I modified your filter to illustrate different "selector" ideas...
P.S. If you totally get rid of the selector component in your filter, the filter will only effect the selected areas if you have a selection selected (similar to my #2 selector effect) -- which makes intuitive sense to me (where I haven't found much use for that component yet). Lab EnhanceSelector_.ffxml |
|
Posted: April 19, 2007 12:19 am | ||
ronviers
![]() |
Hi ssamm,
Thanks for the valuable feedback, everything you said has been extremely helpful. I scrapped the selector component and changed the names of the controls to names recognizable to more people. I added an ‘increase shadow’ control, plus a ‘brightness’ control. I hope you get a chance to look at how I did that to see what you think. I tried to constrain all the sliders in a way that will keep the user from making huge mistakes. I reversed the saturation control – thanks for the tip, I tried and tried to figure that out myself but could not. Here is the new description: This filter allows you to safely brighten images while maintaining detail in highlights and shadows plus make subtle enhancement to fine detail, contrast and saturation while avoiding color shifts. Brightness Contrast Fine Detail Saturation Shadow detail I uploaded it again but it has not shown up – maybe tomorrow. Brgds, Ron Lab Enhance w1v.ffxml @ronviers |
|
Posted: April 19, 2007 1:06 am | ||
ronviers
![]() |
Here are is an example of before and after using the filter with one of the presets.
http://picasaweb.google.com/ronviers/...5826645202 http://picasaweb.google.com/ronviers/...8193378498 @ronviers |
|
Posted: April 19, 2007 1:22 am | ||
Kraellin
![]() |
ah, a Lab guy. never gotten into Lab. still dont understand what the various channels are. but, i know a number of folks that swear by Lab, so, this shld be useful to them.
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|
Posted: April 19, 2007 8:47 am | ||
ssamm |
Nice job, ronviers. I like the brightness addition (as the multiply alone may darken things too much).
Just on a note of personal taste, I've always disliked how overlay seems to "orange" things up. So I usually always end up putting a color blend layer (from the original image) on top of any overlay layer, and this seems to rectify the results more to my liking. (So when I use a color layer above a layer that used your filter, I like it even more. ![]() |
|
Posted: April 19, 2007 9:39 am | ||
ronviers
![]() |
Hi ssamm,
I really like the color blend idea - I never thought of that. I wanted to implement it but I could not think of a way to reciprocate the overlay slider and I do not want to introduce another slider - it is intimidating enough as it is. Thanks for all the valuable help. Making my first filter has been a great experience. Brgds, Ron ![]() @ronviers |
|
Posted: April 19, 2007 10:53 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!
15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!
28 unregistered users.