YOUR ACCOUNT

Login or Register to post new topics or replies
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
I have seen since long time ago many filtres based on maze like style patterns filtres and also some ideas on others threads of the forum like this one made for making pipes

Today I have discovered some works of the artist Theo Van Doesburg seen in this Google images search, some of them look very similar to the works of Piet Mondrian

Well, the reason for making this thread is based on this artwork shown here where there are some nice maze based grids BUT with large empty spaces inside



I have tried to make it but really do not how to make the holes and empty spaces inside, I have the idea it probable must be done with masking but can not get nothing similar

So I would like to know how could be done a generador of these kind of compositions

Thanks very much for any help
  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
Try harder. smile:p

  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
Kidding have fun tinkering.

Simple Grid.ffxml
  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
Simple image manip.

  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
Probably will tinker and upload as full filter. Needs something more original for it to be worthwhile.

Simple Grid Image Manip.ffxml
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
WOW!!! Very good and great result you have done that is very close to the original.
Thanks very much for making this filter and showing how this can be done, like it much and have made an updated version with more colors and more controls.

And found also that as you are not feeding the bomber with a transparent shape, you can tint the white background of the shapes with colors and it looks cool for me.

Simple Grid updated colors and controls.ffxml
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
And you have done TWO different versions, that are complementary, and looks good.

Until now I have only used first one that is the nearest from the example image shown above in first post and for me works better than the second version, although this does not mean that I do not like the second, is also very good idea, has a great potential, and like it but it needs more work and made better.

Quote
Skybase

Try harder


Well, before putting this thread, I already tried 5 different ways to find how I could do this filter that was not really complex, and I thought I could do it, but then I could not know how to make the masking and got some grids but without missing parts.

After seeing HOW you have done it, I must agree with you have said already in other posts and threads, I am overcomplicating things and some things that are mainly simply I try to find a complex way to make it, and the solution is perhaps and probably sometimes much easier

Great how you have done the masking of the bomber using the blocks components with LARGE scale values to show that nice shapes to mask the bomber result with chances. I would have never guessed and tried this and as far as I remember I have never seen any filter that used noise components with the chance in bomber. There is still many things to learn and know about FF.
  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
For the sake of argument, you should upload your attempts even if they don't produce what you want. Maybe you're doing something worthy still of taking a look at. I mean you did try after all and I don't want to be the lone soul contributing ideas!! smile:)
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Quote
Skybase

you should upload your attempts even if they don't produce what you want. Maybe you're doing something worthy still of taking a look at


Yes, you are right, I should have uploaded what I had already done, and sorry that I did not do it, but it was a mess of things I tried, and did not want to upload it this way, now I have cleaned it and leaved only the best option I had.

I made the lines with free rectangle instead of Profile gradient, and used an image to make the masking, but your way to do it is much better, simpler, easier and works very well. As you have already said before, sometimes I overcomplicate things smile:D when the real solution could be simpler and easier as it happens in this case

NOTE:This filter does not work right, I mean that is not finished and do not give the expected results

Theo Van Doesburg Lines.ffxml
  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
The reason why we use profile gradients is because the values fall within 0 and 1 and not beyond. Free <ins ert component names>, transformation components allow us to offset, scale, and otherwise beyond certain val ues. Basically by design the bomber just works best with square input, otherwise the input of the design gets cut off.

lol funny how you connected the blur to all those params. It's valid construction but it's just simply not making sense.
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Thanks Skybase for explaining the difference between using profile gradients VS Free <insert component names> and is good and useful to know it, because until now, the reason for me to not use the Free <insert component names> components is that the seamless tiling is disabled when using them.

Quote
Skybase
Basically by design the bomber just works best with square input, otherwise the input of the design gets cut off.


Good to know that bomber works better with profile gradients and shapes done with these rather with variable size like the FREE components, but for the "cut off" of elements is available in FF 3.0 the "particle adapter" but I this does not solve always the problem because if the shape is FREE component source means that if you rotate it or go outside of the range of the available visible space of the component active part it will still cut off, so is better to use none-free components that keep the square input.

Quote
Skybase
lol funny how you connected the blur to all those params. It's valid construction but it's just simply not making sense


This was suggested by CFandM and is a way to control how tight the bomber particles are following the shape mask, and if want that some of them go beyond the mask limits.
  Details E-Mail
CFandM
ForgeSmith

Posts: 4761
Filters: 266
Quote
SpaceRay Wrote:
This was suggested by CFandM and is a way to control how tight the bomber particles are following the shape mask, and if want that some of them go beyond the mask limits.


Huh What Where..... smile:?: smile:?:
Not for this filter.. smile;)
Stupid things happen to computers for stupid reasons at stupid times!
  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
I think the point to recognize here is that in this filter there's no need to control any of the offset nor chaos parameters. What needs to be controlled though is chance.

Thought it'd be a good lesson here's a nit-picky tip:

In terms of designing filters, I think I've mentioned this before but you shouldn't add controls for parameters specifically needing to be at a certain variable. For example the density parameter on the bomber in this case acts as the purpose why the bomber behaves that way. Capping it at values 2 and 3 might be a better option than having the intslider go full range (1 to 5).

The case and point: our goal's to make Theo Van Doesburg-esque work. The filter is designed to produce that. Parameters that add "alternative potentials" should be carefully rigged to output the desired effect. Well designed filters typically don't need millions of parameters to tinker, they only have a couple given we're trying to attain a look or feel. What makes a filter powerful is a well rigged parameter, not control.
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Quote
CFandM

Huh What Where..... smile:?: smile:?:
Not for this filter.. smile;)


smile:D smile:D Oh, Sorry I have said it wrong, you are right, you have NOT suggested it for THIS FILTER, it was in another thread for another filter some time ago. Sorry I may have confused you with this.

Quote
Skybase

I think the point to recognize here is that in this filter there's no need to control any of the offset nor chaos parameters. What needs to be controlled though is chance.


I totally agree with you, I was only trying to control the offset or chaos only for getting the mask, but you have showed a clver way to do the masking that works perfectly using just the chance, so then there is no need to use any control over offset or chaos, to be kept faithfull to the original design.

Quote
Skybase


In terms of designing filters, I think I've mentioned this before but you shouldn't add controls for parameters specifically needing to be at a certain variable. For example the density parameter on the bomber in this case acts as the purpose why the bomber behaves that way. Capping it at values 2 and 3 might be a better option than having the intslider go full range (1 to 5).

The case and point: our goal's to make Theo Van Doesburg-esque work. The filter is designed to produce that. Parameters that add "alternative potentials" should be carefully rigged to output the desired effect. Well designed filters typically don't need millions of parameters to tinker, they only have a couple given we're trying to attain a look or feel. What makes a filter powerful is a well rigged parameter, not control.


OH, YES!! Very good and well said, I agree with you, and as you say, if you are after a filter that makes some artistic work similar to another, you can´t let the filter make OTHER kind of works that are not in the same style, and must use remapping and capping the values of the controls so it will only give results similar that what you to emaulate.
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
i have found this by chance searching for another different thing and many things have changed in my life since this thread, although I still love much the crossing lines made with this filter and think that this has a great potential for making other more things, including colors and modifying the size of the lines, or other possible variations

Regretably FF does not have FILL FLOW component or script to be able to fill with a color closed shapes that are generated within the lines

i want to thanks again to Skybase for his help
  Details E-Mail
Rachel Duim
So Called Tortured Artist

Posts: 2498
Filters: 188
Well, I was playing with the Simple Grid snippet by Skybase from above, and I see potential here. You can use the output as alpha to do fills if you wish. You can fill with gradients, solid colors, images, etc. If you are interested, let me know and I'll show you what I mean.
Math meets art meets psychedelia.
  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
Quote
Regretably FF does not have FILL FLOW component or script to be able to fill with a color closed shapes that are generated within the lines


I mean... it's way faster doing that by hand you know?

I tried the fill node in Nodewerk and it's just super clumsy. Imagine having to use 1 node per color where you wanna fill and you have to manually input x and y coordinates for where you wanna fill. You can use it with a feedback loop but it's just silly anyway. I can bet you you'd be extremely angry at FilterForge if we had a fill node like that. lol
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Thanks Rick Duim, will answer you later

Quote
Skybase wrote:
I mean... it's way faster doing that by hand you know?


Of course that it may be way faster, and more controlled and customized made by hand and I agree with you, and you can choose exactly the colors you want to put in each closed area. BUT what happens if there may be 40 (or more) closed areas and you want to do variations on this?

It would be good to have filled them automatically with different colors and then modify the ones you think are not good situated

The flood fill component could be configurable to fill empty spaces or with a mask

thinking now about it, is not worth to speak about it, as FF team will surely not make any kind of Flood fill component for FF 5.0, so there is no point in discussing about this and I agree with you that is better to do it by hand
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Quote
Rick Duim wrote:
You can use the output as alpha to do fills if you wish. You can fill with gradients, solid colors, images, etc. If you are interested, let me know and I'll show you what I mean


Thanks for your comment

Sorry, I do not now exactly what you mean with this.

Do you mean to take all the empty spaces (closed or not) from the alpha channel and fill them?

but with this it would be filled everything in the alpha channel and not only the closed parts

Please, could you put an example of what you mean? Thanks

I will put an example to show what I mean.
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Here is the source design made with the first lovely Simple Grid filter by Skybase

  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
And here is the same one that I have filled most of the closed spaces by hand myself with 3 colors

The problem with this is that you have to see if the space is clearly closed following the shape, so this is why I suggested if there could be a way to automatically detect all the closed shapes, and fill them with different colors as shown here

  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
I think you should try digitally painting something like that. You can really get done filling stuff in no time, no matter how many spaces there are lol.

I've been doing some coloring for my friend's comic and it's got a ton of "closed ares" and I can usually get stuff like that colored in 3 or 4 hours if I work at it. And depending on the way I work, I can even make it so that I can change all the colors later in one go. And this can be done using the default Photoshop stuff.

smile;)
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
I have also tested some simple things, like simply adding a spectrum component to the Bomber Tint Color and modify the Tint Amount and you get this nice graduated and semitransparent colors

  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Or the same as above, but instead of spectrum component, use a color control with allow images and then you can show the source image colors, here is the FF Ladybug

  Details E-Mail
Skybase
2D/3D Generalist

Posts: 4025
Filters: 76
Take your time on these kinds of things.

Even in huge studios with 100+ people, it takes 4 or 5 years to develop games or movies because no matter how much technology you put into it, there's always manual labour to be done. And it's really a lot of manual labour. Like probably thousands of hours worth of just moving points or filling in areas... etc etc.

Art is like 90% labour and 10% creative. For the most part we have to do long long long long hours of just doing 1 or 2 repetitive tasks over and over until we get our queue done. The "creative" part is just coming up with the idea.

If you feel frustrated, take a break. Come back later.

A lot of people who rush their work regret it later. And also, rushed art looks like trash to me.

With that being said, nice job for the stuff above. I do like the 3 color stuff you went with. That looks like a good start.
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Quote
Skybase wrote:
I think you should try digitally painting something like that. You can really get done filling stuff in no time, no matter how many spaces there are lol.


Yes I agree that it can be better to do it by hand where you have more control than making it random with FF and be able to position carefully each color where you may want
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Quote
Skybase wrote

Art is like 90% labour and 10% creative. For the most part we have to do long long long long hours of just doing 1 or 2 repetitive tasks over and over until we get our queue done. The "creative" part is just coming up with the idea.

If you feel frustrated, take a break. Come back later.

A lot of people who rush their work regret it later. And also, rushed art looks like trash to me.


Thanks for the comments and I agree with you, I have been working as a digital artist from middle 2006 to end of 2010 and I agree with you that there is a lot of work involved behind one creative idea, asnd it takes time to develop it and may take many long hours, and must take care for all the fine details and check all the parts so it is in the best possible way

Also as you have told very well when I felt frustated, overwhelmed, confused or anything that gets in the way of the creative work, I took a break and then come back later, it can be a few minutes, or an hour or more, or leave it for next day, it depends

i agree that is a bad idea to make a artwork in a hurry and rush to make it earlier or sooner, because it will not work right most of the times, and I agree that rushed art it can be like trash

Regretably I could get little money from my artistic work, specially because I am living in a very small town, and do not know how to make art for people on internet

Congratulations to you Skybase that you are able to live and work with art and design and keep the creative flow in your life

Sorry for taking one month to answer
  Details E-Mail
LexArt
LexArt

Posts: 256
i have. Just discovered this thread and think is very good and interesting, like much this kind of lines connected in such cool way, I did not nkow nothing about this artist from the title

Thanks to SpaceRay for making this thread, and to Skybase for making the filter that makes it possible

i like the examples given and look good
  Details E-Mail
SpaceRay
SpaceRay

Posts: 12298
Filters: 35
Quote
LexArt wrote:
Thanks to SpaceRay for making this thread, and to Skybase for making the filter that makes it possible


Hi, glad you like it and also thanks again to Skybase for making it possible and real

This could have more different variation applying different effects to the lines, neon effect, images inside, textures, colors, etc...
  Details E-Mail

Join Our Community!

Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!

33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!

153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!

15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!

Create an Account

Online Users Last minute:

14 unregistered users.