What happens with the Tint of the bomber plus? is not included

Hello, I have seen that the new bomber plus does not include the "Tint Amount" and "Tint Color" so there is no tint option found on the previous bomber, and do not know why is not included, and how to do it on the new bomber plus

maybe because now all the particles must be already tinted previously before feeding them into the bomber?

I mean that they have to be tinted outside of the bomber before loading them into the new bomber plus?

And also must be added a tint amount component before adding it to bomber?

But how do tint the particles generated inside by the bomber itself if there is no tint feature? This can not be tinted before feeding them as the result is done inside bomber and not before.

I may be missing something or do not understand how is the tint on the new bomber plus

thanks for the help that any of you may give

Thanks very much Indigo Ray, is very interesting to see how you have done the tint with bomber plus and is curious to see, I do not understand it, but does not matter, it works, so I can use it as it is.

I do not know why the tint has been removed from bomber plus, but maybe it is because the way it works.

Oh! you are right Lexart, I did not notice that the Bomber plus, did not have tint included, good question

Quote
Indigo Ray wrote: Let me show you an example of how to replicate tint and tint amount with the Bomber Plus. See the attached filter.

Thanks very much for this filter example showing how to replicate the tint and tint amount missing feature, interesting and useful

Quote
Skybase wrote: It's probably removed to avoid redundant features.

Well I think that if FF team removed it to avoid redundant features, they should have told how to replicate or simulate the same behavior with bomber plus for people that are not expert like Indigo Ray that can be able to figure out how to do it.

I also would not be able to know how to do it, so thanks to Indigo Ray for showing it, and Lexart for putting this thread

I highly suggest that if you find discomfort trying to understand the bomber plus, think of it as visually as possible. I personally don't entirely understand the bomber plus myself, but I like to think visually of what I'm making. It helps me not care about the technical stuff and focus on the design.

Ultimately, you also want to take the time to understand the original bomber itself if you want to understand the bomber plus. Of course, the bomber itself is extremely powerful still and I think it'll cover most of what people are trying to do. In any case, if you feel uncomfortable with the whole plus component things, it's totally understandable, just fall back on the regular non plus components and you'd still be making cool things.

I also think you guys shouldn't wait for examples to fall into your hands. Just don't wait, always make.

I've been recording a very small introduction to using the bomber plus. It covers some topics on tinting/coloring, how to input multiple images, and other neat things you can do.

But it's still scratching the surface.

The reality is, no matter how many examples, tutorials etc there may be, it's really up to you to make the stuff. As much as I may try my best to explain something, it might still be hard to understand something. Some of the things I'm discussing are tricky to explain without using big vocabulary words.

While I don't disagree on the stance with FilterForge providing us with examples, the suggestion about this has been going on for about 3 or 4 years now with not many answers. FilterForge has made a couple demonstrations though and those provide some insight, but not much for beginners. I simply suggest not waiting on it because of this fact.

I guess the best way to do this is to post what you make on the forums. I want to see how people use the bomber plus all the time!