Quasimondo
 |
I didn't find the original thread dealing with the problem that you cannot submit filters that contain a warning sign. Well here is a example of a filter which simply does not work comfortably if I don't use a technique that causes a warning sign to appear, namely to plug a float slider into an int input. Please reconsider the submission policy here.
Filter: Postal Service  |
|||||
| Posted: June 13, 2006 4:47 pm | ||||||
Lucato
 |
- Maybe It was here as exclamation mark.
- Yup, if you use IntSlider, It won't work because It should have a 'Min Value' I think. Quasi, really nice idea btw (the texture/effect). |
|||||
| Posted: June 13, 2006 5:33 pm | ||||||
|
Quasimondo
|
Exactly. "Step" simply doesn't cut it. |
|||||
| Posted: June 13, 2006 5:58 pm | ||||||
uberzev
 |
The whole idea of two types of sliders isn't intuitive or especially usefull. There should just be one slider that handles everything.
|
|||||
| Posted: June 13, 2006 6:26 pm | ||||||
|
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
Yes, I agree, "one slider to rule them all" would be definitely better than two -- but merging the two slider types into one requires a lot of work (due to the current architechture of Filter Forge and the inner complexity of the remapping layer). We will consider this for future releases. |
|||||
| Posted: June 15, 2006 3:05 am | ||||||
|
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
Maybe adding a parameter called Offset to the IntSlider-to-IntSlider would do the trick? For example, you could set Offset to 10, MaxValue to 5, and this would get you the final range of 10-15. |
|||||
| Posted: June 15, 2006 3:15 am | ||||||
|
Quasimondo
|
Yes, Offset would be helpful and the possibility to use fractional values for "step" - the final value would then be rounded to the next integer. |
|||||
| Posted: June 15, 2006 5:45 am | ||||||
|
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
Mario, could you give an example of a situation where the fractional step can be used? |
|||||
| Posted: June 15, 2006 9:28 am | ||||||
|
Quasimondo
|
Let's say I have two profile gradients and for what ever reason, I want one of them to repeat 1.5 times as often as the other one, so I connect both with the same int slider and set the remapping of one of them to "step = 1.5" then the resulting repats woud be Slidervalue 1, A: 1, B: 1 Sildervalue 2, A: 2, B: 3 Sildervalue 3, A: 3, B: 4 Sildervalue 4, A: 4, B: 6 Sildervalue 5, A: 5, B: 7 ... It might not look useful now, but you never know. It's one of those things where I don't see how it could hurt to include it. |
|||||
| Posted: June 15, 2006 11:16 am | ||||||
Join Our Community!
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,737 Registered Users
+5 new in 7 days!
153,582 Posts
+26 new in 30 days!
15,355 Topics
+5 new in 30 days!
Online Users Last minute:
7 unregistered users.
Recent Forum Posts:
- CPU and GPU rendering choices by Graham Rob
yesterday - Unable to save projects by alfie
yesterday - FYI Filter Forge 14 works in Affinity 3.x (Mac) by Cassel
2 days ago - Text Circular Art by Ramlyn by Ramlyn
October 27, 2025 - Filter Forge 14 will not load into Adobe Photoshop version 26.2.0 by CFandM
October 24, 2025 - FF7 unable to update or download Filters by GMM
October 22, 2025 - Chaos Fields by Rachel Duim
October 15, 2025 - The Render Animation output goes almost pink by einfach Alberto
October 15, 2025 - Ultra forge and the Mac by DigitalWheelie
October 8, 2025 - Successfully Looping An Animation by Rachel Duim
October 4, 2025 - Multi Image Stacked Swirl by CFandM by CFandM
September 30, 2025 - Stacked Swirl by CFandM by CFandM
September 26, 2025
