YOUR ACCOUNT

Login or Register to post new topics or replies
ronviers
lighter/generalist

Posts: 4456
Filters: 35
Would it be possible for ff to designate, specify or otherwise sanction a filter for reference purposes? Render time on this standard filter could be designated as a one and used to rate the performance of our computers. This would allow us to make statements about our filters like; this filter renders in 2 minutes on a machine rated a 3.2.
Sorry if this has been discussed before.
Thanks smile:)
@ronviers
  Details E-Mail
Kraellin
Kraellin

Posts: 12749
Filters: 99
there is a mention of machine specs that FF uses to test filters somewhere here in the forums. it sets the standard for rejecting filters that take too long to render. so, i'd guess that would be your base or reference machine. it was something like a 1 ghz cpu with 1 gig of ram or something like that and i believe the rejection time was anything over 15 minutes to render. i have no idea where that thread is now, but you could try some of those specs as search criteria and maybe find it.
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!

Craig
  Details E-Mail
ronviers
lighter/generalist

Posts: 4456
Filters: 35
Quote
Kraellin wrote:
there is a mention of machine specs that FF uses to test filters somewhere here in the forums.

Thanks Craig, I will look into that.
@ronviers
  Details E-Mail
KGtheway2B
KGtheway2B

Posts: 660
Filters: 34
I think filterforge would be a great CPU benchmark. It utilizes multiple cores and tends to have very high CPU usage. The developers should certainly consider nesting a "benchmark" feature somewhere in V2.
  Details E-Mail

Join Our Community!

Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!

33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!

153,531 Posts
+36 new in 30 days!

15,347 Topics
+72 new in year!

Create an Account

Online Users Last minute:

24 unregistered users.