Sjeiti
![]() |
||
Posted: February 27, 2009 11:06 am | ||
Sjeiti
![]() |
Forgive me for asking a stupid question, but what exactly are you trying to do here?
If it's just using two parts of a gradient, wouldn't something like this be easier/faster?:: splitGradient_easier.ffxml |
|
Posted: February 27, 2009 11:12 am | ||
ronviers
![]() |
Hi Sjeiti. Thanks for having a look and for the very interesting snippet.
Notice the nodes framed in the work area of the attached snippet. The four on the left are the component parts of the gradient that have been defined by the contrast component and separated by the thresholds. The four tone curves represent breakout points that can be used to modify each component separately. The gain curves could be replaced by any other curves or blends etc. splitGradient Sj.ffxml @ronviers |
|
Posted: February 27, 2009 11:38 am | ||
StevieJ
![]() |
Hey Ron
![]() ![]() It took me a few minutes (I'm a little slow ![]() ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|
Posted: February 28, 2009 2:20 pm | ||
ronviers
![]() |
Thanks Steve.
![]() ![]() Here is a new one with a mirror option – inspired by Sjeiti's version. splitGradientMirror.ffxml @ronviers |
|
Posted: February 28, 2009 2:30 pm |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,716 Registered Users
+6 new in 7 days!
153,539 Posts
+8 new in 7 days!
15,348 Topics
+72 new in year!
27 unregistered users.