Messages 46 - 86 of 86
First | Prev. | 1 2 | Next | Last |
lipebianc
![]() |
Extra post-processing by Diff Tint Looks filter
![]() "From the moment we are born, we start being filtered..." |
|||||
Posted: July 17, 2012 5:50 am | ||||||
Carl
![]() |
very nicely explained
![]() |
|||||
Posted: July 17, 2012 6:22 am | ||||||
Ghislaine
![]() |
Nice, nice and nice
![]() visit https://gisoft.ca |
|||||
Posted: July 17, 2012 9:36 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Very well done and excelent examples and interesting, useful and good tips and suggestions to use better your filter, thanks very much
I have a question, Is this the photo of where you are living ? ![]() ![]() ![]() WOW!!! this really reveals the hidden secret of the photo, amazing conversion !!! |
|||||
Posted: July 17, 2012 10:55 pm | ||||||
Morgantao
![]() |
WOW!
Amazing examples, and amazing explanations. I love how you show the before and\on\off examples, they really show the different effects. ![]() |
|||||
Posted: July 19, 2012 1:49 am | ||||||
Sharandra
![]() |
Absolutely amazing filter! My new favorite
![]() ![]() |
|||||
Posted: July 28, 2012 2:13 am | ||||||
lipebianc
![]() |
||||||
Posted: December 13, 2012 2:33 am | ||||||
lipebianc
![]() |
||||||
Posted: December 13, 2012 2:42 am | ||||||
lipebianc
![]() |
||||||
Posted: December 13, 2012 2:44 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Well, this is no surprise seeing the very high quality and well done artistic effect that you can get with this Congratulations, you deserve it very much for having made such an awesome, useful and excelent filter like this. |
|||||
Posted: December 14, 2012 3:53 pm | ||||||
Morgantao
![]() |
The suprising thing is it took it so ling to beconme an HU
![]() Fantastic filter, and great new samples you got here!!! |
|||||
Posted: December 16, 2012 7:39 am | ||||||
lipebianc
![]() |
SpaceRay and Morgantao: thank you so much for your kind words!
![]() ![]() Surprisingly (or not), this filter took me almost 7 months to be completed (!!!) Mostly because: - my total lack of free time ![]() - little FF developing knowledge skills (specially the bomber) - many, many trial and error - speed optimizations - endless testing on all kinds of images - feature 'trimming' ![]() Below, an example based on preset #6 (All "TEXTURE Layer(s)" set to '0') ![]() "From the moment we are born, we start being filtered..." |
|||||
Posted: February 18, 2013 2:05 am | ||||||
lipebianc
![]() |
||||||
Posted: February 18, 2013 2:12 am | ||||||
annettep38
![]() |
I love this filter but maybe I'm doing something wrong? it takes ages on my computer last time it was 28 minutes on a pretty simple image (1000x2000) with one of the presets.. has put me off tweaking anything.
My original photos I haven't even tried, they are 25 Mpx What is causing it? mac OS 10.6 Macbook Pro about 2 years old. PS or not, same result. |
|||||
Posted: March 18, 2013 7:47 am | ||||||
lipebianc
![]() |
annettep38, what preset did you render? Was a factory preset?
Was the option "SHARPainting (Slow)" activated on that preset? Try turning of? Low "STROKE Repeat" values can also slow down rendering a bit... How long it takes to render using FF built-in images? I did some tests here using a 1000x2000 image and rendering took nearly 1 minute (I am on a 3 years old PC) "From the moment we are born, we start being filtered..." |
|||||
Posted: March 18, 2013 8:57 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
This an excelent, amazing and full of artistic awesomness, and this filter is one very good reason to have filter forge
![]() In the examle below I have used the FF built in Lionfish WITH transparency and with preset 1 and it fills all the transparent background with a black texture (the white addes after as the optional and well done border) and as far as I know there is no setting that can make the filter do NOT fill that transparent background, or I may be missing something and do not know it. Sorry lipebianc to say something negative on your awesome creation, but I think that maybe would be useful to have the ability to use images with transparency too, and if it is already possible, please, would like that you tell me how can be done. If making this filter to make use of transparent background is not possible and would be a lot of work to modify it so it can use transparent background is hard, do not bother about it, it was something I just found. Perhaps using some alpha mask detection could work. Thanks very much ![]() |
|||||
Posted: May 14, 2013 4:27 am | ||||||
lipebianc
![]() |
Thank you for your input about this subject, SpaceRay.
Unfortunately the filter's original concept is different, so it was not designed that way. Right now I don't have either time or knowledge to accomplish your request with efficiency. Feel free to modify it, BUT I'd appreciate some proper credit if a modification of this filter was submitted to the library as a new filter. Best regards! "From the moment we are born, we start being filtered..." |
|||||
Posted: May 14, 2013 7:22 am | ||||||
Skybase
![]() |
OOO a challenge! And great homework material for SpaceRay! haha... DIY man! Try it!
Actually, for this filter to accommodate alpha layers it'll probably need a major rebuild if we were to do this effectively. We can easily throw in a threshold with alpha channel but that's not going to preserve strokes nor will it present the distortions introduced in the process. So given how preserving the looks would be a priority, it'll need a major overhaul. Well... maybe I'm wrong. |
|||||
Posted: May 14, 2013 8:23 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Thanks for answering lipebianc, and as I told you above, do not bother at all, if this can´t be done as is not something important or needed, just was a suggestion and something I found and could be useful to have.
OF COURSE that I would always give credit to you if I would modify this filter and would not submit it to the library, I would just send it to you and you can submit it if you wanted.
I have to say that before writing this I have already tried to see if there could be a way to make this possible and have tried many settings combinations, and then also have opened it in filter editor and tried some modifications but none of them did work and get the same result, only one of them did work but without the nice strokes, so I think that maybe is much harder than it seems and so I will not bother with it, as I said is not very important. |
|||||
Posted: May 15, 2013 2:32 am | ||||||
Skybase
![]() |
![]() ![]() SpaceRay, if you ever run into a wall like that, don't hesitate to ask the forums about it. At LEAST I'll leave answers if the questions aren't too specific. I personally think having questions regarding modifying or building filters would help the community and many others who may be struggling with the program as much as you are. In any case, don't hold problems back regardless of how simple it is. Take some screencaps... tell us what you're trying to do. We most likely have solutions. I personally feel you often hope somebody else will do you a favor. I figure you do try modifying it yourself but end up struggling and giving up on it. At least these forums have answered many of your requests, and I do hope you picked up something from them. But I'm sure you can also ask us questions... as much as you typically leave a bunch of posts every week anyway. Just don't hold problems to yourself. ![]() Oh and hey... so last night I tried modifying this filter myself haha... oh boy I'm entertained. |
|||||
Posted: May 15, 2013 4:17 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Well, thanks for the offering and I agree that is good to ask for help in the forum if you have tried and can not make something, BUT I do not want to bother you or any other with things that really are not important and not needed much, I mean that this was something I found that was not possible and tried to do it, and could not do, and then I just suggested if the author or anyone knew if it was possible, but as said, is not something that I really wanted to have much or needed to have. If it is possible, good, if not, does not matter much. I would surely ask if I really needed and wanted something that was important and I could not find a way to do it, and so I reserve it for this and not just ask help for anything.
I like your answer and I agree with you and thank you for what you said and is good and kind from you, but I think is bad from me that when I try to make something and then I try a few times and I can´t, I very fast become frustated and ask for help and hope that anyone with much more knowdledge and skills could do it if wanted, but this is not good to do it many times and seems like a selfish thing, so I will not do it again unless as said above is really something needed and important, and not something that I have thought or had the idea and without any important purpose. You (and also some other FF users too) have helped me much and I thank you really much for all the help and time you have spent on me, and I appreciate it and glad for it, and have learnt a lot from you and how you do things, but I will not keep asking things in the way I have done before, because I think is not the right way to do it. As said I will only ask for help again for things that are really needed and important, or will make suggestions for some possible things that could be done by any other BUT would be just that, a suggestion and not something to be expected to be done by other. Thanks very much for your patience, and for being kind and I know is not easy to be with me and understand me and know why I make the things I make in the way I make them, but I am triying to change and do not continue doing it badly many times. |
|||||
Posted: May 15, 2013 12:14 pm | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Skybase in the post above is the answer to you
As said already before, you deserve much this kind words for making such great, useful, helpful and artistic filters with this high quality and great ideas. You say that you have FF developing knowledge skills, but you make such a great and well done filters in such a way that looks that you are really an expert, at least in the kind of filters that you do. Perhaps you mean that you need lots of time and as you said many, many trials and errors and lots of testings with many images to finally reach to something as good as this filter and you would like to make it faster and easier having more FF knowledge and skills with less trials and errors. Anyway, I appreciate all the effort you are doing and the hard work for creating the filters you make that are great. Thanks and I wish you the best and that you can keep making more of your great works. |
|||||
Posted: May 20, 2013 9:21 am | ||||||
GMM
Moderator
Posts: 3491 |
This filter works fine on PC but fails to render on Mac, starting approximately from 4000x4000 images. It doesn't show any errors but rendering doesn't ever finish.
I'd recommend against using it on Mac until we figure out what's happening. And of course any feedback from Mac users would be very welcome — it is difficult to debug something that doesn't crash... |
|||||
Posted: August 8, 2013 4:45 am | ||||||
LakeEffects
Posts: 38 |
I think I was one of the Mac users to mention that this was freezing up on me. As you say, no details to offer about what happens. Everything is fine until hitting the Apply button. It looks like it's going to work but the progress bar never shows up and a check on the dock shows that FF needs to be Force Quit.
Bummer, because this is an awesome filter. DebraS |
|||||
Posted: November 7, 2013 9:48 pm | ||||||
gill
Posts: 8 |
Any news on the Mac side yet? I so want to use this one. I've tried deleting various bits like the hdr, the border etc, but nothing seems to work. It rather renders (if you'll excuse the pun) my recent FF upgrade useless.
|
|||||
Posted: March 5, 2014 9:50 am | ||||||
gill
Posts: 8 |
I just thought you'd like to know I have in fact managed to get it to work without the HDR, by deleting the whole HDR section. Those three invert, desaturate, blur & blends must be too much for our poor old Macs. It's still slowish - about 20 mins for a 4000 x 2500 pixel image - but gives a good paint effect and I can do the HDR part beforehand.
Maybe it would work without alteration, but I gave it half an hour and still nothing had happened. |
|||||
Posted: March 6, 2014 10:59 am | ||||||
LakeEffects
Posts: 38 |
I should try that, but not sure I know how. It's been hugely disappointing that it still doesn't work on Macs. Even if you leave it overnight, nothing will happen.
My only workaround has been to use a very small image and then upsize it in Photoshop. DebraS |
|||||
Posted: March 6, 2014 11:22 am | ||||||
gill
Posts: 8 |
Hi Debra, if you open up the filter, on the far left just above the image box there are three sets of components:
desaturate,invert,blur,blend, delete all of those but leave the slider at the bottom as that also controls brightness later. Then drag an arrow from the image to the hue/saturation box just next to the last blend, save and voila! I originally bypassed the tint section too, but it only saves a few minutes processing. There seems to be a superfluous blend just below the image, it's a bit messy to take that out, but it doesn't seem to make any difference. Hope that helps ![]() I take back all I said FF, I just love being able to alter filters! |
|||||
Posted: March 6, 2014 12:03 pm | ||||||
gill
Posts: 8 |
|
|||||
Posted: March 6, 2014 12:04 pm | ||||||
gill
Posts: 8 |
And thanks lipebianc for a hugely interesting filter, I'm sorry I had to mess around with it!
|
|||||
Posted: March 6, 2014 12:21 pm | ||||||
LakeEffects
Posts: 38 |
Thanks, gill, for the how-to. I will give it a go!
DebraS |
|||||
Posted: March 7, 2014 6:50 pm | ||||||
oreosPaul
Posts: 21 |
It's been so long,...still no word on fixing this so it works on the mac?
|
|||||
Posted: March 28, 2014 2:58 am | ||||||
oreosPaul
Posts: 21 |
I believe it's the responsibility of "Filter Forge" the software company to fix this problem, rather than the person who created the plugin, using their software. As it works on the PC...just not working on the mac. It's such a great plugin so the tech guys who get paid to fix bugs in this software need to spend some time on this and fix it?
![]() |
|||||
Posted: March 28, 2014 3:08 am | ||||||
oreosPaul
Posts: 21 |
Is there anyone having plug ins work fine until you hit apply and then it freezes,.. or goes at a snails pace, nothing like is indicated when working in it while tweaking?
It renders fine all the way through your tweaking it in Filter Forge,.. working on it in "actual image" setting, proving that it can render the file, but just freezing after you go ahead and apply? |
|||||
Posted: March 29, 2014 7:49 am | ||||||
Erik Pedersen
![]()
Posts: 290 |
Thanks for this filter! I use it pretty often for everything from adding subtle texture to full on Paint HDRtist effect. This is one of my 'top ten' filters that I use in my work.
The Joy is in The Work |
|||||
Posted: January 20, 2015 10:50 am | ||||||
Drfunk
Posts: 7 |
||||||
Posted: July 29, 2015 7:10 pm | ||||||
Erik Pedersen
![]()
Posts: 290 |
Have you checked under Settings to make sure that it is not set to 'Seamless Tiling'? Also, sometimes if you have a selection this can happen, or if the image is larger than your canvas (i.e. dropped a larger image into another one of smaller size) and last, sometimes it helps to actually select the entire part you want affected. Those are all the tricks I know. I don't have this problem with this filter though so am not sure how to replicate the problem you are having, but I have had this type of problem with other filters - sometimes with a bright pink stripe on the right side instead. Hopefully something here helps! Good Luck!
The Joy is in The Work |
|||||
Posted: July 29, 2015 9:41 pm | ||||||
zigzag
Posts: 2 |
I can't get this to ever finish rendering, after an hour and half I give up
![]() In PS the progress bar never appears and in FF standalone it comes up but the green bar never appears. The pc is working on overdrive and sounds like it might take off. Help ![]() |
|||||
Posted: October 11, 2016 9:44 pm | ||||||
Erik Pedersen
![]()
Posts: 290 |
The size 5360 x 3577 is pretty big! If it is at 300 DPI it is no small wonder your machine is struggling. If you NEED it that big you will have to let it run, perhaps overnight while you sleep! Another factor is your video card - it could be a part of the problem if a weak performer, but seriously, that's a pretty big image. I normally do images at 1920x1200 and 96 DPI and they average a few minutes to twenty minutes. As a test try a smaller version (watch that dpi) and see if it works better.
The Joy is in The Work |
|||||
Posted: October 12, 2016 1:09 am | ||||||
Skybase
![]() |
I recommend disabling anti-aliasing if you're experiencing horrible render times.
|
|||||
Posted: October 12, 2016 2:32 am | ||||||
zigzag
Posts: 2 |
Thanks for the replies, the graphics card is fast and anti aliasing is turned off. I've just tried a smaller image and it rendered a 3360x2242 px in a couple of minutes, yay! So can't figure out why a little bit bigger never renders.
<edit> I've gone back to the ff settings and changed it from using all eight cores of the processor to just one and reduced the memory allowance to 54% and it's actually rendering a larger image at 5360 px albeit very slowly but at least the green bar's appeared. I have ff on a smallish ssd c drive, could it be the temp folder doesn't have enough space? |
|||||
Posted: October 12, 2016 5:53 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,712 Registered Users
+19 new in 30 days!
153,533 Posts
+31 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+73 new in year!
22 unregistered users.