Carl
![]() |
||
Posted: February 21, 2007 12:52 am | ||
Carl
![]() |
nice filter.......... the default doesn't do it justice
![]() |
|
Posted: February 21, 2007 12:54 am | ||
Sjeiti
![]() |
thanks...
yeah I'll update the default ... in fact I thought I had a better default. You know how you sometimes save a filter and it overwrites the default preset? I think that's what happened. (that's one for the wishlist) |
|
Posted: February 21, 2007 1:37 am | ||
Crapadilla
![]() |
The default preset you saw, saved and submitted probably didn't have 'Seamless Tiling' activated. For the library, all the presets get rendered with 'Seamless Tiling' on, and thus you are seing different presets now.
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|
Posted: February 21, 2007 5:08 am | ||
Carl
![]() |
It does seem a pity to spend the time tweaking your presets for the optium result to have a leser version appear.
|
|
Posted: February 21, 2007 6:09 am | ||
Sjeiti
![]() |
default seamless... I never noticed that... anyway, it is updated.
|
|
Posted: February 21, 2007 9:07 am | ||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Taking a quick look inside the filter, I immediately wondered whether there could be an 'esoteric' reason you are using uberzev's snippet in there. The Perlin Noises all have an Angle control built-in after all...
![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|
Posted: February 21, 2007 12:40 pm | ||
Sjeiti
![]() |
There is a reason for that. In fact my first version was without that snippet; rotated by noise and faded from top to bottom. But I wanted to fade the tear to any angle... so... thats the 'esoteric' reason. I know it would be faster without but it's not that slow is it?
(Of course if there was some rudimentary way of coding in there I'd test the noise angle and only use 45 degree fades, who'd notice.) I even tried to combine the rotation snippet with the proportional gradient snippet (since posters are rarely square) but I'm not that smart/patient. |
|
Posted: February 21, 2007 2:03 pm | ||
Torley
![]()
Posts: 303 |
From the sound of it, I've gotta try this out for myself beyond just looking at that picture. I like ragged, torn effects. This might be good for my next freakshow matte!
![]() I'm enjoying using Filter Forge to create http://torley.com/textures |
|
Posted: February 23, 2007 8:21 pm | ||
Constantin Malkov |
This is excellent filter, Sjeiti! Thanks much! And the name "Forgotten Poster" describes the essence of this filter on all 100%!
![]() But I still cannot understand some things You've done inside which I was need to fix: - I removed "Any Angle Rotation" snippet and changed it on Perlin's inner angle control (like Dilla suggested it - I agree with Him here) - Changed Profile Gradient component on "Proportional Gradient Snippet" by Uberzev I was need to do it in order I could work with non-square images. You talked about these things but I cannot understand why You still didn't fix them. So, sorry - I won't improve the usage stats on this filter ![]() Thanks again! |
|
Posted: December 19, 2008 10:41 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,712 Registered Users
+19 new in 30 days!
153,534 Posts
+27 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+72 new in year!
30 unregistered users.