Filter Forge - Ink ghosts by Tim2501

Active Topics Search

Indigo Ray

Adam

Posts: 1442
Filters: 82

Ink ghosts by Tim2501
http://www.filterforge.com/filters/10137.html

Posted: November 24, 2011 9:09 am

Details E-Mail

Indigo Ray

Adam

Posts: 1442
Filters: 82

It's not quite like ink in water, but it's still pretty. smile:)

Posted: November 24, 2011 9:11 am

Details E-Mail

ronviers

lighter/generalist

Posts: 4456
Filters: 35

excellent. one of my favorites:)

@ronviers

Posted: December 4, 2011 3:45 pm

Details E-Mail

lipebianc

FFF = Filter Forge Fan

Posts: 566
Filters: 12

beautiful, delicate and smooth...just incredible!
Another instant favourite!

"From the moment we are born, we start being filtered..."

Posted: January 30, 2012 9:48 pm

Details E-Mail

thedarkmaster

thedarkmaster

Posts: 5

Man, the results of this filter are incredible but it's terribly sloooooooow.... I'm rendering a very small 2000 x 2000 picture since yesterday dammit... it's still not completed... and I'd have to render many more pics like that... any suggestions?

Posted: January 31, 2012 8:38 am

Details E-Mail

SpaceRay

SpaceRay

Posts: 12302
Filters: 35

Quote
thedarkmaster wrote: . I'm rendering a very small 2000 x 2000 picture since yesterday dammit... it's still not completed...

Obviously there is something wrong in it, I think is impossible that it is STILL rendering since YESTERDAY !!!

Please have you seen that the green bar in the bottom right moves or any image result on the screen ?

I have tried myself to make renders with this filter and if you use the 600x600 presets it only takes a few seconds

BUT if you go to "new image" and put a new resolution, for example 900x900 which is really small, and then nothing happens, I leaved it rendering for 40 minutes, and nothing was seen that it was really making the render, the green bar at the bottom did not move at all.

I tried to "Save it as" to see if the render could work in that way, and it does not work either,

It seems like FF gets frozen on any resolution over 600x600.

If you change back to 600x600 it works very well smile:?:

I really do not know what is happening

Posted: January 31, 2012 12:33 pm

Details E-Mail

thedarkmaster

thedarkmaster

Posts: 5

Yeah I've seen the same problem! Though after 3 or 4 hours, in 2000 x 2000 resolution, I start to see the picture. It starts being rendered... in an incredibly slow way. I tried 3000 x 3000 the first time and after an entire night... the screen was still gray, no picture and no progression at all. Then I tried 2000 x 2000 and today there where some bit of picture created...
It's really incredible how heavy this filter is and consider that I have a latest generation MacBook PRO, top model with 2.2 Ghz Intel Core i7 (turbo boost up to 3.2 Ghz or something like that, don't remember), 8GB of RAM!!!
That's crazy -_-'

Posted: January 31, 2012 12:58 pm

Details E-Mail

CFandM

ForgeSmith

Posts: 4770
Filters: 267

Well one of the most taxing components on any system are the blurs...Put together two blurs and the filter will render slow....This one has 5...So yep its going to crawl..... smile;)