Kraellin
Kraellin

|
oh cool  you have a good eye for light, ronviers. i may play around with these a bit. would you mind if i posted any of these on retouchpro? glad he's getting accustomed to you. give it a while... he'll be eating out of your palm. you're on the right track
and thank you for posting those  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 8, 2008 2:13 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
i may play around with these a bit |
I was hoping you would say that.  We make a good team.
Your welcome to post them at retouchpro. Let me know if you want them resized or otherwise modified.
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
he's getting accustomed to you |
I don't know if it's possible to make him a genuine people cat now, after being born and partially raised wild but I guess I will find out.
@ronviers
|
Posted: February 8, 2008 2:19 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Did the work you did on the first one take a lot of time? I wish now that you would have done it on the original 3072x2048 but I bet that would have taken forever. @ronviers
|
Posted: February 8, 2008 2:21 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
thanks for letting me post them on retouch. i'll let you know if and when i do and post a link. and no, i dont need them resized. i can do that in psp if needed. i have a pretty good method for that (i dont use bicubic when resizing upwards). there is also a new method of resizing coming down the pike that pretty amazing, but i dont have a program for that one yet.
if you've got him comfortably sleeping near you now, he'll come around. just give him a small dish of milk every once in a while and he'll be purring in your lap. it may take a while, but cats always take a while even when originally domestic.
the first one was all done in psp and didnt take too long. it's remembering all the steps that's hard. psp doesnt save workflows, much to my dismay. so, it would be hard to recreate it exactly. i do know that i used the 'brushstrokes' filter for the main effect, but not much more than that. and no, it wouldnt have taken forever. psp can handle large sizes. but, now that i think about it, i did also do some hand work and that would take longer on a larger image size.
if you really want, you could post a larger image size on photobucket or someplace like that and post the link here and i would use that. but i dont guarantee that i'd try to replicate the last effect. in fact, most likely not. i tend to like NEW  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 8, 2008 2:35 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
I thought about it and I'm really happy with what I have. I like the very wide black border. Thanks  @ronviers
|
Posted: February 8, 2008 2:50 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
cool beans  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 8, 2008 4:01 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
ok, a little different approach this time. again, this was all done in psp. did some lighting and other preps and then a bit of charcoal. i did two versions, slightly different, but one with a much closer crop. i also resized both.  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 9, 2008 9:59 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
and here's the other...  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 9, 2008 9:59 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Hey Craig these look great! I like the second one best. I like the crop best on the first one but I know it's not popular to center the subject. I think the tighter crop works better for your technique. Do you think I left too much detail in the shadows? Next time I think I will run a threshold on the shadows and pull out some of that unsightly background.
Would you rather work with images with a huge amount of detail or small amounts of very important detail? Do you take a lot of pics yourself?
@ronviers
|
Posted: February 9, 2008 10:43 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
hi ron,
good, glad you like them
2nd the best... ok. but crop on first one... hmmm... what if i did the same final treatment on the first that i did on the 2nd? it was basically just darkening the background a bit more.
the crop is somewhat based on the 'golden triangle' rule/guide. offsetting the main object tends to add a little more punch or interest. i forget why, but it seems to work most times
as for too much detail, it really doesnt matter too much. i did brighten the image first and then just blurred and darkened the background where i didnt like it. so, it's a matter of what belongs and doesnt belong and that varies with the image and less importantly, the technique. i did a ship scene recently on retouchpro where i removed several elements that were modern. the ship was an old sailing ship, so i wanted to give it an old world look. so, bye bye cars and anything modern
regarding what i like to work with... i used to work on icons/avatars going down to 50x50 pixels. but, i've also worked on 90 meg files. so, i'm easy  generally, when doing photo art, retouching and restorations, the bigger the better. it's much easier to delete resolution/detail than to add it. so, yeah, big is good for photo art.
and yes, i used to take pictures all the time. i've had cameras ever since i was a teenager. by the time i was in my early 20's i had a Canon F1 film camera and was buying accessories as fast as i could earn money. then, somewhere in the mid 70's, i quit, mostly. i still had my camera but got busy with other things. when digital came along, i bought one of the first casio's, 640x480. lol. it wasnt very good, but it was such an innovation that i was hooked again, somewhat. but, it's only been recently that i got a real digital, 8 megapixel, 5x optical that i could carry around with me and started shooting a lot again. i'd carry it everywhere on my belt. but, it just got damaged here recently, so, i'm without again  but, that shldnt last too long
when i got into computers in the early 70's, i was sort of hooked on that also. but, it wasnt till the mid 80's that i really did much with them and almost the 90's before i got into manipulating images with paint programs. by the end of the 90's i was still really only joking around with digital manipulating, but after the turn the century and particularly for the last few years, i've really taken to it and now help moderate on retouchpro. you can see some of my restorations and art over there. i use the same name as here.
so, you can see how my love of photography and now digital manipulation sort of came together here lately. filter forge just made it all that much easier to do even more. i've got all sorts of plugins for photoshop and psp but hardly ever use them any more because of FF
oh, and another thing that fueled my interest in photo manipulation was my old film negatives. i'd lost a lot of my old prints but still had a lot of my old negatives. so, i bought a negative scanner and run them into the computer, clean them up and print them out again. much fun  my 'rose' pic is one of those. that was taken back in the mid 70's with my Canon F1 while running around Ann Arbor, Michigan.
and restorations came about through family photos of my mother's. she's even got old tintypes of great-grandparents which i scanned and then restored. quite cool  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:26 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
here's one i took with my 8 megapixel and then touched up a bit. it actually could stand a bit more work, but does show an example.  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:31 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
here's one of my old film negative images i ran through the negative scanner. this is before i cleaned it up again. these had been sitting around doing nothing for years. as you can see, there were specs and dust all over it   If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:39 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
and this is after cleaning it up.  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:40 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
and then this is after 'artifying' it a bit. i actually have quite a few of these and put them in a slide show set to music. if i still had my server up, i could show you.  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:43 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
sorry for talking your ear off here, but it is my passion. so, be careful about asking too many questions... i may just answer  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:44 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
ok, so sliding back to the kitty pics, feel free to comment and ask for adjustments or something you'd like to see. i love doing custom work. trying to get 10,000 folks to go 'ooh' and 'ahh' is REALLY difficult, but getting ONE to do that... now, that's worth the effort
also, since i've spoken at length here, what about yourself? you've obviously got a good eye. i've commented on that a couple times here. are you pro? looking to go pro, or just having a really, nice hobby? oh, and do feel free to respond in the same lengthy manner as i did  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:51 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
and while i'm waiting for your reply, here's another of that rose, artified.  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:55 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
I thought I would have a quick go at this one. I'm a slut for contrast and saturation.   @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:56 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
yup. good one! mine was too bright and i knew it. you've set a border to it with darkening. nice  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 12:59 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
I didn't discover photography until a couple of years ago and I only got into graphics a little more than a year ago so I am very much a novice. I wish I had started earlier. I feel like everything previous had been misguided.  @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:00 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
you realize, i hope, that you've set my muse off and now i'm going to ruthlessly hijack your thread
so, here's another of the rose...  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:00 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
you've set a border to it with darkening. nice |
I ran it through my Lab Enhance filter then did a radial gradient with gray to white blended with linear burn. @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:02 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
kinda grabs ya, photography, doesnt it?
and dont worry about being a 'novice'. i'm still a novice. have fun with it. get someone to go 'ooh!' and 'ahh!' over something you produce and you'll never put it down  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:03 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
This is Sphynx.'s thread. He's probably furious by now. I doubt that he will ever speak to us again. @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:04 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
yeah, nice filtering  and that's the other great thing about digital... you can take lousy photos and make them good in the digital darkroom of paint programs and filters and plugins and so on.
when i started shooting with my 8 megapixel, i was all worried about shutter and film speed and all the various settings i used to fuss with in film. but, i realized after not too long that i could really just focus and shoot and take it all to psp or photoshop or FF and have it do what i really wanted there. so, my attention started going off the camera and its settings and into the next shot almost before i'd taken the current one. that makes things a lot easier. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:08 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
kinda grabs ya, photography, doesnt it? |
Photography was the gateway drug. It lead to post processing then to textures then to 3d. Now I'm totally consumed with Maya - every waking hour.  @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:08 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
hehe, we'll have to bribe him  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:08 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
hehe, yeah, you've got the bug. poor, poor man!  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:09 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
i was all worried about shutter and film speed and all the various settings i used to fuss with in film. |
Those things are a trap. They keep you from taking emotional photos. @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:10 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
well, i never got as far as my own darkroom in film, so i had to pay attention to getting the shot right the first time. so, i had filters and lenses and tripods and macro lenses and extension tubes and ... well, you get the idea.
now, my darkroom is psp or photoshop or FF. i love digital!  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:12 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
ok, let's take your 'pb3' kitty photo and see what we can come up with using FF only  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:13 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
ok, there's a plugin for photoshop called 'Buzz' or 'Buzz Pro'. i was trying to recreate some of its features using only FF. i never finished the filter, but it does do some things. here's your 'pb3' photo under my buzz filter...  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:18 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
i never got as far as my own darkroom in film |
Would you believe I have never printed anything. I don't even have a printer. The only device I have ever output to is a crt.
Btw, the roses are amazing. What resolution does your scanner bring them in at?
@ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:18 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
nothing really spectacular there. it's more of a softening filter. but, it's ok. lemme see if i cant find something else  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:19 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
wow! no printer? wow. well, if you decide to get one, i can recomment the HP Photosmart D7260 for prints up to 8 1/2 x 11, anyways. very crisp, bright images and true to your monitor, providing your monitor is somewhat calibrated, of course.
and thanks on the roses.
the scanner scans negatives at 1800 ppi. it's a dedicated slide/film negative scanner. so, it wont scan prints and such. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:23 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Your buzz is nice but I think it would benefit pb3 from masking the eyes. I think the eyes (well, the one eye) of that photo are the most important part. It seems he's got the weight of the world on his shoulders. @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:23 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
wow. i hadnt realized there was another kitty in that shot until i did this one. this is a result from the mod i did of the 'sketch and color' filter. normally, i would touch this up either before or after using FF, but this is just the raw FF image for show and tell   If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:27 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
when i got into computers in the early 70's |
My first class used the PDP 11/70. I virtalized its instruction set on my Atari 600 and turned my homework in from that.  @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:28 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
yeah, the buzz isnt finished. it was just the first thing i ran across. and i agree about the eyes. that last one shows the eyes much better. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:29 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
oh lord, the atari 600. lol. i used to drool over the 800, which i couldnt afford at the time  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:30 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
being into photography and maya, have you tried out any of the hdri programs out there yet? If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:31 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
i used to drool over the 800 |
My real computer was the Heathkit et3400a. Now that was a personal computer.
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
have you tried out any of the hdri |
I don't have the horsepower for rendering intensive applications. Right now I'm working on the underneath. Fortunately for me I imagine my creatures from the bones out so it has not been a problem.  @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:36 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Quote |
---|
Kraellin wrote:
i used to drool over the 800 |
Two of my friends had the 800s (one had 64K!) and another had the trash 80. They all wanted me to be jealous but I was totally happy with what I had.
Two had cassettes and one even had a floppy disk drive.  @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:45 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
ronviers
lighter/generalist

|
Does your 8 mega pixel camera shoot raw? @ronviers
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 1:47 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
Kraellin
Kraellin

|
Quote |
---|
ronviers wrote:
My real computer was the Heathkit et3400a. Now that was a personal computer. |
hehehe, i havent heard the name 'Heathkit' in a looong while. lol. i had a heathkit radio that was a hand-me-down from my older brother
Quote |
---|
ronviers wrote:
don't have the horsepower for rendering intensive applications. Right now I'm working on the underneath. Fortunately for me I imagine my creatures from the bones out so it has not been a problem. |
yeah, being into maya you probably wouldnt have the big need for hdri. different worlds. hdri in photo-manipulations is all the rage now. i even tried making an FF hdri simulator with a little bit of success, but nothing i'd care to publish.
from the bones out... so, you're building skeletons of critters and then skinning and texturing them over? cool! now that i think of it, didnt you post some pics of some of those a while back here?
hehe, cassettes! my commodore 64 had a cassette  jeeze, c-64's, atari 800's, heathkit, trash 80... remember the texas instruments ones and the timex sinclair?
no, it doesnt shoot in raw. i had to sacrifice that for getting 8 megapixel and 5x optical  still, the jpg's are pretty damn good, so i'm not complaining too much. and, it being broken at the moment, well, wouldnt matter if it shot in mpeg2  If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig
|
Posted: February 10, 2008 2:02 am |
Details
E-Mail
|