|
Kork
Posts: 5
|
We were just trying around with the new 2.0 and fiddled with the offset filter. Much to our surprise we noticed that the offset filter does no longer wrap the image around (e.g parts of the image that are offset outside the image area will be inserted on the other end). This worked in 1.x. Is this intended? If so, how can we get an offset that wraps in 2.x?
Kind regards,
Jan
|
| Posted: April 28, 2010 3:52 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
|
Betis
The Blacksmith
|
I would say first to make sure that seamless tiling is on. Roses are #FF0000
Violets are #0000FF
All my base are belong to you. |
| Posted: April 28, 2010 4:08 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
|
Kork
Posts: 5
|
Hmm this one is disabled and it's probably disabled by the "free rectangle" component. Wonder why this prevents seamless, where "frame" does not.
|
| Posted: April 28, 2010 4:22 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
|
Betis
The Blacksmith
|
Ah. Free Rectangle disables seamless because you can have the rectangle outside image boundaries, hence the "Free" in the name. If you had half a rectangle on the right side of your image, do you think it would be very seamless?   Roses are #FF0000
Violets are #0000FF
All my base are belong to you. |
| Posted: April 28, 2010 5:43 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
|
Kork
Posts: 5
|
Well if it wraps around it would be. So basically i am stuck with frame and offset then?
|
| Posted: April 28, 2010 5:45 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
|
Betis
The Blacksmith
|
Here's what I suggest, do a Polygon snippet that's not free, then just use the offset component, that should work. Roses are #FF0000
Violets are #0000FF
All my base are belong to you. |
| Posted: April 28, 2010 5:54 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
|
Kork
Posts: 5
|
That does the trick, thank you
Though being able to set position AND size within ONE component would be more convenient (which is why we opted for "free rectangle" i the first place). So now if I need like 16 different rectangles I need 32 components (16 polygon and 16 offsets). Maybe in a later version, free rectangle can be made seamless (in fact you can do anything in free rectangle with a combination of polygon and offset, so I really don't see why this wouldn't work). |
| Posted: April 28, 2010 6:18 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
|
Betis
The Blacksmith
|
Well, the polygon doesn't allow you to place the radius outside image boundaries, allowing it to wrap seamlessly. Roses are #FF0000
Violets are #0000FF
All my base are belong to you. |
| Posted: April 28, 2010 6:21 pm |
Details
E-Mail
|
GMM
Moderator
Filter Forge, Inc
Posts: 3491
|
Kork, we have pairs of components exactly for this purpose. If you need seamless tiling use Polygon, Ellipse and Profile Gradient instead of their 'Free' counterparts. Note that Offset doesn't break seamless tiling.
|
| Posted: April 29, 2010 2:39 am |
Details
E-Mail
|
