Crapadilla
 |
I was wondering whether it would be possible to decouple the blur radius on the blur component into Radius X and Radius Y. This way we would have a nice way to achieve directional blurs without needing a dedicated component for it.
An angle parameter would further sweeten up the component then, allowing for 'any angle directional blur' capability.   --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
| Posted: August 25, 2007 4:27 pm | ||||
Kraellin
 |
dilla, vlad probably understands what you're asking for here, but i'm a little confused. how would uncoupling the radius give you directionals? isnt blur global? how do you see this uncoupled blur applying over an image or texture? i sort of understand what might transpire there, but only vaguely. got an example of how this would work?
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
| Posted: August 26, 2007 10:31 am | ||||
StevieJ
 |
I think Dilla is talking abouit combining the blur and directional blur into one component.....
"Any Angle" is a good idea......I know of some noise components that could really use it as well  Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||
| Posted: August 26, 2007 11:29 am | ||||
|
onyXMaster
Posts: 350 |
You might be surprised, but there is already an "any angle directional blur". The component is called "Motion Blur". It has usual radius control, angle control, and the directional coefficient which dictates the strength in the angle direction.
|
|||
| Posted: August 26, 2007 12:49 pm | ||||
|
StevieJ
|
Oh, sorry.....I meant that by "Directional Blur"..... Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||
| Posted: August 26, 2007 2:16 pm | ||||
|
Crapadilla
|
Yup, now that you mention it, a new component I'd not seen before seems to have miraculously materialized in my component bar. Now that's what I call customer support!
Feature request retracted! --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
| Posted: August 26, 2007 4:08 pm | ||||
|
StevieJ
|
LOL.... Hmmmmm.....Could I get Polar and Rectangular Array to materialize in my tool bar???
 Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||
| Posted: August 26, 2007 4:37 pm | ||||
|
onyXMaster
Posts: 350 |
Well, Polar (if it's a Cartesian<->Polar coordinates and backwards) is very easy to implement (a week or so, including testing, excluding user documentation), it would break seamlessness of almost any filter, so unless we get to the "non-seamless" filters in the next version (FF 2?), I don't think so
|
|||
| Posted: August 29, 2007 3:32 pm | ||||
|
Kraellin
|
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
| Posted: August 29, 2007 3:36 pm | ||||
|
Crapadilla
|
LOL
--- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
| Posted: August 29, 2007 3:53 pm | ||||
Join Our Community!
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,712 Registered Users
+19 new in 30 days!
153,533 Posts
+31 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+73 new in year!
Online Users Last minute:
28 unregistered users.
Recent Forum Posts:
- Manson Grudge Border by Jaret by Minko
yesterday - Kaleidoscopic Variations Vol. 2 by jhantares by jhantares
September 10, 2025 - Polygonal Images Set by Ramlyn by westdale
September 10, 2025 - FF Killing Resolution by SpaceRay
September 9, 2025 - Geometry Spinner by Rachel Duim by Rachel Duim
September 6, 2025 - Channel Glitch by Martin Naumann by SpaceRay
August 31, 2025 - Circuit Glitch by Martin Naumann by SpaceRay
August 31, 2025 - Groovy Rays by Ramlyn by Ramlyn
August 31, 2025 - Is Ultraforge dead? by dpankros
August 30, 2025 - Component Instances by AussieDecalf
August 27, 2025 - Hyperbolic Tiling Challenge by AussieDecalf
August 27, 2025 - Chaos Fields by SpaceRay
August 27, 2025
