Crapadilla
![]() |
Yup, I figured it was about time we had a little survey.
All you lovers of the 'Feature Wishlist' forum, welcome! Please head over to the "Feature Wishlist Archive" and take your time to carefully browse through it, because I'm going to ask you to write down your top 3 of features you'd like to see most. If possible, please do share with us some of the reasons behind your choice... ![]() ![]() ![]() Now, with that nailed down, I'm going to make a start. My personal top 3 feature's I'd like to see most are as follows... 1st Place FF as a compositing-application plug-in, conforming to the emerging OpenFX standard, preferably. Yup, this would totally rock IMHO, and would also take care of all our batch rendering and animation needs in one grand stroke. I'll keep my thumbs pressed! Btw, this takes all the first three spots in my book, so I'm going to continue with... ![]() 4th Place Bomber components (i.e. particle placement components). Unfathomably powerful. I'm already entertaining at least 50 filter blueprints using bombers in my mind... just... need... bombers... ![]() ![]() 5th Place Redesign of the Randomizer to allow for more fine-control, including the ability to lock certain controls from randomization by default, and of course by user input. This is waaaaayyy needed to make filters with more than 7+/-2 controls viable and usable. Alternatively, I'd also be happy with the following for my 5th place: Fixed' and 'Proportional' options for gradients, i.e. options to make gradients independent of 'Size, pixels' and Image Aspect. [probably goes for some other components as well] Damn, I'd love that! ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
Posted: August 29, 2007 3:51 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
1. break the seamless for non-square image sizes. most of my filters and the stuff i work on is for photo art and such. very few photos are square.
2. user made folders for sorting and storing of filters. basically, an expandable file tree. leave the library categories, but open up the rest for user control and organization. 3. controls that only show when that 'leg' of the filter is switched to an 'on' position. when that leg is off, the controls would disappear again. we already know vladimir isnt likely to do drop down controls, so this would make an excellent alternative. this would clean up so much in the GUI when control numbers go above about 10. i like your list too, dilla, but i just feel these are things that are long overdue to the current situation rahter than new, cool items like bombers. If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 29, 2007 5:12 pm | ||||
Sjeiti
![]() |
Good idea Crapadilla.
1: 7.6 Gradient Components :: 'Fixed' and 'Proportional' options for gradients (i.e. options to make gradients independent of 'Size, pixels' and Image Aspect). The need for this goes without saying really. 2: 5.2 Filter Browser :: Customizable 'MyFilters' category including sub-folders. Because the goal here is to make finding filters easier maybe a better idea would be a tag based search that also works in the not-'MyFilters'. That would probably also skip having to go online to find a filter even though you've already downloaded it. 3: 6.2 Node-Network Editing :: Highlight outgoing connections of selected component. This would really help for larger filters. Sometimes with a lot of connections that are miles apart, the only way to find the right connection is to zoom out and wiggle a component to make the connection move. |
|||
Posted: August 30, 2007 2:29 am | ||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Maybe I should also start another thread where we all say it together: "Damn you, stupid Mac version!" ![]() ![]() ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
Posted: August 30, 2007 8:34 am | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: August 30, 2007 9:10 am | ||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Actually, I'm hoping to see this 'fixed' with some minor usability update. It can't be too hard to implement, and it is long overdue indeed. --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
Posted: September 2, 2007 12:08 pm | ||||
Kraellin
![]() |
well, we've had, what, two updates now since the official release? yes, i was hoping it would come sooner too, but seems Mac is getting most of the attention at the moment. and we're nearing 4000 filters! ummm, can you say 'disorganized?', kids?
![]() If wishes were horses... there'd be a whole lot of horse crap to clean up!
Craig |
|||
Posted: September 2, 2007 2:14 pm | ||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Well, since you asked
![]() ![]() 1) Improve Lighting: Cleaner HDRI lighting (reletively flat horizons with vertical adjustment to remove/minimize lighting reflections).....Individual HDRI Components.....HDRI component editor.....and the option to remap parematers and merge lighting controls into the filter control panel. All of this would be toooooooo sweet!!! ![]() 2) Lockable Controls: Little check boxes to the side of controls....which would dramatically help both users and authors zero in on things.... 3) More Noise: There's so much more that could be done.....Editor to create custom noise components....includes Dilla's Bomber/particle components, of course ![]() ![]() Nothing much really.....just a few minor "adjustments" to the program ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||
Posted: September 2, 2007 9:40 pm | ||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Once we get bombers, there won't be much of a need for 'more noise' IMO, as we'll be able to easily contruct our own noises with these particle tools. Imagine hooking up a pyramidal or spherical gradient to a bomber, setting up random rotation and scale, and selecting a 'lighten' blend mode for the particles. You'd easily end up with something very similar to a curve-mapped cells or pyramids noise, only that you have more control over the individual shapes. That's your editor, and it's powerful! Besides, there's a lot more to the seven standard noises than is apparent. ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
Posted: September 3, 2007 5:42 pm | ||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Has Vlad ever mentioned any future plans towards this???
Yeah....started getting into various "detail" approaches.....and starting discovering some neat little tricks by differencing various noise and combining blends..... Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||
Posted: September 3, 2007 7:17 pm | ||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
Well, the best info we have about bombers is collected in this thread, I believe. --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
Posted: September 4, 2007 5:38 am | ||||
StevieJ
![]() |
Just read all of it.....sounds like Vlad is thinking of a single 'particle' component in the patterns catagory.....
I still think that expanding the noise components (in addition to this) would be of particular use towards simplifying alot of filter concepts.....and maybe bypassing some of the speed issues that arise by having to manipulate the slower noise components..... Don't get me wrong.....I'd be extremely happy with just the addition of a particle component.....well, with anything on the PC side of it.....just so long as it continues to grow ![]() ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||
Posted: September 4, 2007 9:17 am | ||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
How would you like to see the noise components expanded? Got any examples? [You probably know this thread where Vlad makes good points why new noise components might not be necessary.] --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
Posted: September 9, 2007 6:41 am | ||||
Reiveld |
Just 1.... The ability to have multiple favorite 'folders'
|
|||
Posted: October 20, 2007 7:58 pm | ||||
Crapadilla
![]() |
You're disqualified. It has to be three! ![]() ![]() --- Crapadilla says: "Damn you, stupid redundant feature requests!" ;) |
|||
Posted: October 21, 2007 5:26 am | ||||
StevieJ
![]() |
LOL.....
![]() Yeah, customizable folders is big on everyone's wishlist ![]() Steve
"Buzzards gotta eat...same as worms..." - Clint :) |
|||
Posted: October 21, 2007 12:41 pm | ||||
Nic74 |
1. Fixing some basic light and reflection rendering stuff.
Like better hdri adjustment, so you could control direction of lighting (offset). Better control over reflections and flat reflections (offset and angle, maybe scale and load in a different reflection map) Changing light conditions is ofcourse a very nice feature and if you do it you can take care of reflections. It would be nice to visually place the reflection. With flat reflections I mean you get like a window reflection on flat surface and changing the angle for different look. I would ofcourse love to have somthing like AE plugin "ZbornToy" (nice example what you can do with realtime lightning and 2d maps (depth map and colormaps)). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOWiuLl5aeY 2. Importing vector grafic (.ai) Make text, custom patterns and shapes. It would be nice to bake a tileble vector shape you done in illustrator into the filter so you can do that chainmail or whatever shape you need, without spending hours doing the simplest forms. Vector is small and can be scaled without pixilation so it should be nice to bake it into the filter. 3. FF as a compositing-application plug-in, conforming to the emerging OpenFX standard, preferably. Yes I want to use FF filters in AE... even if it could take alot of time to render each frame. Very close to get on the list is AO pass and posteffect pass after the "final output"(after height and reflection)So you can for an example do better bloom effects. |
|||
Posted: October 24, 2007 5:52 am | ||||
Sphinx.
![]() |
I haven't used filter forge for long, so enlighten me if these features already exists..
1. Grouping of filter/module clusters - the UI quickly gets chaotic, would be nice to put a group of filters in a box or something, that then could be closed 2. Comment/annotation "stickers" 3. Allow sliders to go through a curve (you're stuck with linear increase/decrease) |
|||
Posted: October 26, 2007 5:30 am | ||||
Qender |
1. Ability to use plug-ins in after effects CS3, or some way to apply the filter to a video. That would just be awesome, and I know the film community is always in need of new fire/water/electricity etc. Some of the following effects seem like they were born just for video! Imagine these with video under them: Bright Dots - Scanline - The Ring Effect - Comic Book - Chocolate Factory
Each one of these alone could be an expensive stand alone plug in! 2. Mac Version. I use PC, my girlfriend uses Mac. She's a graphic designer, and she insists that the majority of the graphic design industry is mac based. And that no professional graphic design firm uses PCs. I tend to think there are some designers that use PCs, but it would seem that a majority of Filter Forge's users would be mac based. 3. Some simple shapes or functions, it takes a while in FF to make circles or rotate an image. There's so much power in many of the features, yet I feel so powerless all of a sudden when I want to make a circle! Perhaps the offset tool could include rotate and zoom? 4. (Oh Noes, I is cheating!) Dropdown menu with text in controls. I'de like to give people options like "normal, additive, multiply" instead of the vague slider it has now. Let me know if there's a way of doing this and if I'm just doing it wrong! |
|||
Posted: November 2, 2007 6:53 pm | ||||
BLUEFROG
![]() |
1. Mac Version!
2. Mac Version!! 3. Mac version!!! BLUEFROG Oh, and the ability to create filter groups that can be added or removed as an object. Say you have a series of components that creates a spherical deformation. This could be saved as a group (internally to the filter or externally but importable into other filters) and added on the fly without having to rebuild the chain. |
|||
Posted: November 3, 2007 12:48 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,533 Posts
+38 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+73 new in year!
15 unregistered users.