Sphinx.
![]() |
It would be great with an option in the filter editor to update all used components to latest version.
|
|||||
Posted: March 26, 2010 6:12 am | ||||||
KGtheway2B
![]() |
Oh goodness yes. +1
|
|||||
Posted: March 26, 2010 2:24 pm | ||||||
Digital Smith
![]() |
I think it is possible to write an external script to do this fairly easily... I'm gonna see if I can make one.
|
|||||
Posted: March 26, 2010 4:15 pm | ||||||
Digital Smith
![]() |
in the code a new blend node looks like this:
An old blend node looks like this
SO... for blend nodes it would be search and replace '' with '' There is a bit more to it but it should not be too hard |
|||||
Posted: March 26, 2010 4:30 pm | ||||||
Sphinx.
![]() |
Yeah Jim, I ended up doing something like that. But it would definitely be more user friendly with a build in feature.
|
|||||
Posted: March 27, 2010 5:53 am | ||||||
ronjonnie
![]() |
Good morning Everyone,
Yeah, That sounds GREAT! Lets hope the F/F Team agrees! Rock on! Have a GREAT day! ![]() Ron zazzle.com/Ronspassionfordesign*
So much to learn, so little time. |
|||||
Posted: March 27, 2010 6:39 am | ||||||
Totte
![]() |
I did that with my Stairways to heaven filter which I happened to start in FF2. There are a a bunch of items to change, plus the obvious version info, and remove the AO settings, but it is doable, I know
![]() - I never expected the Spanish inquisition |
|||||
Posted: March 27, 2010 8:25 am | ||||||
Vladimir Golovin
Administrator |
Technically, it will be possible in future versions -- some of the code we're doing for v2.0 can be adapted for this functionality. It will work even if the old and new components have different sets of inputs (some renamed, some added, some deleted). We don't plan this for v2.0 though -- too much to do, too little time.
|
|||||
Posted: March 27, 2010 11:10 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
Oh YES !! +100 |
|||||
Posted: June 6, 2012 12:07 am | ||||||
Sphinx.
![]() |
I actually made a web app for this task.. but my work server is dead atm. I'll see if I can get it transferred to another server..
|
|||||
Posted: June 6, 2012 10:10 am | ||||||
SpaceRay
![]() |
YEs, Please, if you have a web app for this task will be very interesting to have it available and hope that you can transfer it to another server. Thanks |
|||||
Posted: June 10, 2012 2:38 pm | ||||||
Sphinx.
![]() |
BUMP!
I'd like to challenge your concept of pixel perfect backward compatibility via the component versioning strategy. 1. Why would anyone want to use an outdated version of a component? 2. Your list of components to maintain and support will just grow and grow 3. There is no way to update a filter so it uses the latest components (other than the "manual way" which is really not a practically viable option) 4. A growing number of my old filters crash FF - it seems to relate to old obsolete components I suggest you revise that strategy: A. Only create a new version if it changes existing input options in a fundamentally incompatible way (did that ever happen outside beta period? Perhaps "Offse t" which you should really have chosen another name for as the new version did something else). I think most filter authors would rather be running on the newest version with a fractional difference from the old numeric output than running an old obsolete, perhaps buggy and likely slower version... B. Provide a way to upgrade filter components in the editor, either by forcing the upgrade when filter is opened in the filter editor, or by a "Update Components" menu item. I would not mind the first option at all. If you are worried about the library and the overall impact this would have (i.e. push filters toward edge version), you could provide versioning of the library filters instead (this would have other advantages too). Happy coding ![]() |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2017 3:25 am | ||||||
Skybase
![]() |
Shout out to this bump. I'm honestly happy about the fact that FF has been consistently "backwards compatible" even with filters I created back when I was in college. That was 2009 when I submitted my first ever filter to the library and I'm pretty sure I have filters from even earlier that I can still happily open. But the whole deal having these obsolete components feel like they're just dangling things of the past and that just seems like it's going to keep growing and growing heh.
But I think we need to start rethinking this. I'd like to see this update components option as well! |
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2017 4:13 am | ||||||
GMM
Moderator
Posts: 3491 |
I can only say this feature is on the Internal Feature Listâ„¢. Sorry, no endorsements or promises, as usual.
|
|||||
Posted: May 23, 2017 5:45 am | ||||||
Sphinx.
![]() |
||||||
Posted: May 23, 2017 7:32 am | ||||||
Grimbly
Posts: 68 |
Ya if we could update all the old nodes in a filter automatically instead of manually it would super handy. Some of my filters have over a hundred nodes so it becomes very impractical to update each one manually
![]() |
|||||
Posted: March 10, 2018 11:38 am |
Filter Forge has a thriving, vibrant, knowledgeable user community. Feel free to join us and have fun!
33,711 Registered Users
+18 new in 30 days!
153,533 Posts
+38 new in 30 days!
15,348 Topics
+73 new in year!
19 unregistered users.